Removing racially restrictive language from our Covenants
Here's a little more background and information on removing Paragraph
6 from the Covenants than we could fit on the postcard...
The covenants were written back in 1949. It was a different era and
different laws applied to buying/selling homes. Paragraph 6 reflects
the attitudes and laws of those times. Since then, the Fair Housing
Act has made the Paragraph unconstitutional. Unfortunately, the
original developer didn't give the community a way to modify the
covenants. So technically, paragraph 6 is still on the books. The
community, to my knowledge and from my readings of old meeting minutes
from the 1950s, never actually enforced the covenant. Yet, it is still
there.
Sometime in the past, a practice was begun to blot out the paragraph
on the HOA packets as unenforceable and unconstitutional. However,
that doesn't technically or legally remove it from the covenants.
Last year, I happened to be reading the Maryland Homeowners
Association Act (I know, I need a hobby). It seems that sometime in
the last few years (2004?), the Maryland General Assembly addressed
situations just like ours and created a way to remove racially
restrictive covenants when no other option is available. (If you're a
policy geek or need some sedative reading, you can find the procedure
in the Maryland Code, under Real Estate, Title 11B Section 113.3. You
can find it here.
All it takes to get the ball rolling is approval of 85% of the lot
owners. Since every lot owner receives a bill for their maintenance
fees, and nearly everyone pays, the Board of Governors decided this
was the most effective/efficient way to do the vote to get approval--
hence a seperate "ballot" that was included with your maintenance fees
(the yellow card) vs. the ballot for the Annual Meeting.
For the person who was asking, and anyone else who's interested,
here's Paragraph 6 which was probably blackened out on your HOA
packets (and online):
"6. At no time shall any lot or any part thereof be sold, leased,
transferred to or permitted to be occupied by any Negro, Chinaman,
Japanese, or person of Negro, Chinese, or Japanese descent. This
restriction is not intended to include servants or employees of the
owner or occupant of said lot."
Sam Gallagher